Yamini Soni v. Bilaspur University
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1552 of 2018 Yamini Soni D/o Shri Hitendra Soni, Aged About 21 Years, President Student Union CMD PG College Bilaspur, R/o Gondpara Thana City Kotwali, Civil And Revenue District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. Bilaspur University Through Registrar, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
2. Exam Controller Bilaspur, University District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
3. Principal / Senior Center Head Prof. C.M.D. P.G. College Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
4. Center Head (1st Shift) C.M.D. P. G. College, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
5. Assistant Center Heads (1st Shift) C.M.D. P. G. College, Bilaspur, DistrictBilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
6. Secretary, Department Of Higher Education Chhattisgarh Dks Bhavan Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
7. Collector, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Sumit Shrivastava, Advocate.
For Respondents / State : Mr. Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer.
For Respondents No. 3, 4 & 5 : Mr. Ashish Shrivastava with Mr. Soumya Rai, Advocates.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 16/07/18 1.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner on behalf of students of the CMD College who ought to have been permitted to use scientific calculator for the B.C.A. Part - III exam 2018 held on 03.04.2018. 2.
Learned counsel appearing for respondents No. 3, 4 & 5 - College would submit that University has already issued revised guidelines on
27.02.2018 prohibiting the use of scientific calculator in the examination. 3.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records with utmost circumspection.
4.
Since, the examination has already been concluded on 03.04.2018 and the revised guidelines was issued by the University on 27.02.2018 prohibiting the use of scientific calculator in the examination therefore, no permission can be granted to the students for the use of scientific calculator in the examination.
5.
Accordingly, the writ petition as framed and filed deserves to be and is hereby dismissed. No order as to cost(s).
SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka