High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5043/2017disposed off

Smita Kardale v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-11-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 5040 of 2017 • Sonal Dube D/o Om Prakash Dube, Aged About 35 Years, By Occupation Lecturer Panchayat, Govt. H.S.S. Sejbahar, Block Dharssiwa, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Commissioner Cum Director, Panchayat, Sanchanalaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Collector, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Chief Executive OfÏcer, Zila Panchayat, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent And WPS No. 5043 Of 2017 • Smita Kardale W/o Sanket Kardale, Aged About 37 Years By Occupation Lecturer, Panchayat, Govt. H. S. S. Bhandarpuri, Block Arang, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner Vs

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Commissioner Cum Director, Panchayat, Sanchanalaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Collector, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Chief Executive OfÏcer, Zila Panchayat, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent

For Petitioners Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate For Respondent /State Mr. Adhiraj Surana, Dy. GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 16/11/2017

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that for the present, the petitioners would not press the relief clause 10.3 of the petitions.

2. Accordingly, the petition is considered on merits for the other reliefs claimed in para 10.

3. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties would jointly and fairly submit that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been considered and decided by this Court on 03.11.2017 in WPS No.4271 of 2017 (Jayant Kumar Patle Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others, and other connected matters}, therefore, these writ petitions may be disposed of in terms of the order passed in Jayant Kumar Patle (supra).

4. Accordingly, the present writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court in Jayant Kumar Patle (supra). A copy of the order passed in Jayant Kumar Patle (supra) be placed on record of the present writ petitions. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna