Trilochan Singh Rathiya v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4625 of 2016
1. Trilochan Singh Rathiya S/o Shri Surit Singh Rathiya, Aged About 38 Years Occupation Service Asst. Teacher Panchayat, Government Primary School Barbaspur, R/o Village And Post Kudekela, Tah Dharamjaigarh Distirct Raigarh Chhattisgarh
2. Ashwani Kumar Patail S/o Late Shivlal Patail, Aged About 50 Years Occupation Service, Asst. Teacher Panchayat Government Primary School Munud, R/o Village Kharra, Post Baheramar, Tah Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh
3. Ajay Kumar Bek, S/o Telesphor Bek, Aged About 42 Years Occupation Service Asst. Teacher Panchayat Government Primary School Jaampali, R/o Village Purunga, Post Hatti, Tah Dharamjaigarh, Distirct Raigarh Chhattisgarh
4. Mani Ram Rathiya, S/o Late Sidar Ram Rathiya Aged About 42 Years Occupation Service Asst. Teacher Panchayat, Government Primary School Munund, R/o Village And Post Chhal, Tah Dharamjaigarh Distirct Raigarh Chhattisgarh
5. Amar Sai Nirala, S/o Shri Surit Singh Rathiya, Aged About 40 Years Occupation Service Asst. Teacher Panchayat, Government Primary School Chinpur, R/o Village & Ost Sithra, Tah Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh
6. Smt. Fulkumari Tirkey, W/o Shri Xavier Tirkey, Aged About 50 Years Occupation Service Asst. Teacher Panchayat, Government Primary School Sarasmar, R/o Village Rekmakhurd, Imlipara, Post Bakaruma, Tah Dharamjaigarh Distirct Raigarh Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, New Mantralaya, Mahandi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. The Collector, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh
3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh
4. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Dharamjaigarh, Distirct Raigarh
Chhattisgarh
5. The District Education Officer, Distirct Raigarh Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :
Mr. A. N. Bhakta, Advocate For Respondent-State :
Mr. Dilmanrati Minj, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.
Order on Board 08/09/2016 Heard on admission.
1.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are working as Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) since 1998, neither they have been given Kramonnati nor they have been given Samayman Vetanman (time bound pay scale) and therefore, they may be permitted to file representation before the competent authority for redressal of their grievances. To this, counsel for the State has no objection. 2.
Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.
3.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off. In the eventuality of making any representation by the petitioners highlighting their grievances, the same is expected to be decided by the authority concerned expeditiously in accordance with law.
4.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the representation in accordance with law.
Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Tiwari