← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCC/689/2017disposed off

Arun Kumar Kashyap v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-09-19Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR0 MCC No.689 of 2017 Arun Kumar Kashyap S/o Shri Ram Prasad Kashyap Aged About 56 Years R/o Near Arti Computers, In Front Of B J P Office , Karbala Road, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

---- Applicant

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Higher Education Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisarh.

2. Commissioner, Higher Education Government Science College, Hostel No. 4 Raipur Chhattisgarh. Now Indrawati Bhawan New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. The Principal, Dwarika Prasad Vipra Mahavidyalaya Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

4. Chairman, Governing Body, Dwarika Prasad Vipra Mahavidyalaya, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents ___________________________________________________________________ For Applicant : Shri P. Acharya, Advocate.

For Respondent/State : Shri UNS Deo, Government Advocate.

___________________________________________________________________ Hon'ble Shri Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Sharad Kumar Gupta, Judge.

Order on Board Per Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Chief Justice 19/09/2017 1.

We have heard the learned counsel for the Applicant and the learned Government Advocate.

2.

The direction in paragraph-4 of the judgment dated 21.7.2017, which is sought to be clarified, is to the effect that Writ Appeal No.185 of 2017 is allowed and resultantly, Writ Petition (S) No.7323 of 2009 shall be tagged alongwith Writ Petition (S) No.6440 of 2009. That direction obviously means that the Registry has to treat Writ Petition (S) No.7323 of 2009 as back to file. There can be no technical approach in the matter of reading and understanding the judicial orders.

The effect of the judgment rendered on 21.7.2017 in Writ Appeal No.185 of 2017 is that the order rendered in Writ Petition (S) No.7323 of 2009 on 1.5.2017 is vacated. This obviously means that the writ petition has to be listed for further consideration in terms of the direction contained in paragraph-4 of the judgment dated 21.7.2017 in Writ Appeal No.185 of 2017. 3.

This MCC is ordered accordingly.

Sd/- Sd/- (Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan) (Sharad Kumar Gupta) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE Anu