High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3303/2020disposed off

Ramji Pal v. State Of Chhattisgarh,

2020-08-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

-1HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3303 of 2020 • Ramji Pal S/o Late Ramnaresh Pal, Aged About 44 Years Working As Assistant Block Education Officer ( A. B. E. O.) At Block Education Office, Pathariya, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

4. District Education Officer, Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh.

5. Block Education Officer, Pathariya, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Govind Dewangan, Advocate.

For State/Respondents :

Ms. Richa Shukla, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

ORDER

21.08.2020 Heard

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as Shiksha Karmi Grade-I on 20.06.2008, thereafter, after obtaining the permission to appear in the fresh recruitment from the Department, he appeared in the recruitment process of Assistant Block Education Officer (A.B.E.O.) and he was selected on 26.09.2015 to the post of A.B.E.O. Subsequently since the petitioner has rendered the service from 2008, he claimed for higher pay-scale according to the different guidelines and directions/ circulars issued by the State, but the same was not considered and eventually he preferred a representation to

-2the respondent No.3 through proper channel, which remains undecided till date.

2. Since the limited prayer has been made that the representation of the petitioner may be decided within a stipulated time, without any observation on the merit of this case and right of the petitioner, it is directed that the petitioner shall be at liberty to make a fresh representation to the respondent No.3, Director, Directorate of Public Instruction, within a period of 3 weeks and if such representation is filed, the same shall be decided within a further period of 90 days from the date of receipt of the representation.

3. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Jyoti