Vishal Singhania v. State Of C.G. And ORS.

MW $W§

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR,

REVIEW PETITION No.

L/ /2o12 Inifhe matter of:

W.P.

[C] No.459/2012 Petitioner:

Vishai Singhania

Versus

Responden'rs:

STaTe of CG. & o'rher's APPLICANTS / ishal Singham'a, son of Shri Shravan Singhania, aged abou'r years, ii'g.'4..11"yig:[%i"f/residem of Sarla Villa, FlaT y"

"dh'shn...

Haw"

No.06, Raigarh (CG) Vs P( ISmIe of Chhof'risgarh, RESPONDENTS Through The SecreTary, Minisfr'y of Commercial Tax, Man'rr'alaya D.K.S.

Bhawan, Raipur (CG) The Commissioner, Commercial Tux DeporTmenT, Raipur (CG) Depu'ry x3.

The Commissioner & Addi'rionai CoHecfor, Commercicl Tax, Biiaspur Division No.2, Biiaspur.

a?"

W

The Addih'onal /z Tehsildar & Commercial Tax Officer, Circle-1;

Commercia!

Tax Deparfmen'r, Raigarh.

REVIEW PETITION UNDER RULE 9O (1) OF THE C.G.

HIGH COURT RULES, R/W

ORDER

RULE R/W SECTION OF CPC FOR REVIEW / MODIFICATION CLARIFICATION OF THE

ORDER

DATED 12.%O12 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WRIT PETITION [c] NO.459/2012 (VISHAL SINGHANIA V5.

STATE OF C.G.

& OTHERS)

m3?!

Wm Wmwm maum w v S B Hon ble Shrl Justice Pra shant Kumar Mishra'

25 3 2015 Shri B P Sharma Advocate With Shri Han Agrawal Advocate for the applicant z State.

Shn A. Pandey; PL for the Learned counsel for the applicant pleads no instructions. V'

Since no other counsel is appearing to press this review petition nor any representation is made, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the review petition for want of prosecution.

Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed for want of N prosecution.

Sd//- Pimshant Kumar'Mishra Judge mam x MM ADVOCA k 1 90/0:

Printed E