High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3285/2020disposed off

Shivram Tandon v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-08-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

-1HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3285 of 2020 Shivram Tandon S/o Late Parmanand Tandon Aged About 45 Years Working As Assistant Block Education Officer, (A.B.E.O.) At Block Education Office, Masturi District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. District Education Officer Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

5. Block Education Officer Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Govind Dewangan, Advocate.

For State/Respondents :

Ms. Richa Shukla, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

ORDER

20.08.2020 Heard

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed as Shiksha Karmi Grade-II on 05.09.1998, thereafter, after obtaining the permission to appear in the fresh recruitment from the Department, he appeared in the recruitment process of Assistant Block Education Officer (A.B.E.O.) and he was selected on 26.09.2015 to the post of A.B.E.O. Subsequently since the petitioner has rendered the service from 1998, he claimed for higher pay-scale according to the different guidelines and directions/ circulars issued by the State, but the same was not considered and eventually he preferred a representation to

-2the respondent No.3 through proper channel, which still remains undecided till date.

2. Since the limited prayer has been made that the representation of the petitioner may be decided within a stipulated time, without any observation on the merit of this case and right of the petitioner, it is directed that the petitioner shall be at liberty to make a fresh representation to the respondent No.3, Director, Directorate of Public Instruction, within a period of 3 weeks and if such representation is filed, the same shall be decided within a further period of 90 days from the date of receipt of the representation.

3. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Aks