← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1846/2020disposed off

Smt. B.D. Soni v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-09-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1846 of 2020

1. Smt. B.D. Soni, W/o Shri Dr. B.P. Soni, Aged About 56 Years, R/o HIG - I, 49-A, Narmada Nagar, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Arban Administration Department, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Municipal Corporation Bilaspur Through The Commissioner, Nehru Chowk, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. Smt. Shakuntala Pandey W/o Dr. Anjani Kumar Pandey R/o HIG - I 49 Narmada Nagar, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ----- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Atanu Ghosh, Advocate For Resp. No. 2 :

Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 03.09.2020

1. The limited grievance that the counsel for the petitioner in the present has, is the alleged encroachment and illegal construction that the Respondent No. 3 is making on Plot No. 49 at Narmada Nagar, Bilaspur, C.G.

2. At this juncture, the counsel for the Municipal Corporation enters appearance and submits that he has instruction and stated that the writ petition may be disposed off and that the Respondent No. 2 shall be taking appropriate steps in respect of the complaint made by the

-2petitioner. That after due verification of facts and enquiry appropriate action if necessary would be taken.

3. Given the said submission by the counsel for the Respondent No. 2, the present writ petition stands disposed off directing the Respondent No. 2 to look into the complaint of the petitioner and shall after due verification and enquiry take appropriate remedial measures for redressing the grievance of the petitioner, which includes ensuring that any construction which is being made by the Respondent No. 3 would be strictly in accordance with law.

4. It is expected that the Respondent No. 2 shall take appropriate decision at the earliest, preferably within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt of copy of this Order.

5. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed off Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rahul