← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1609/2018disposed off

Firan Lal Kenwat v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-06-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1609 of 2018 Firan Lal Kenwat S/o Shri Darashram Kenwat Aged About 34 Years R/o Village Barduli, Post Office Odekera, Police Station Hasaud, Tahsil Jaijaipur, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Janjgir, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

2. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Sakti, Civil And Revenue District JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

3. Additional Tahsildar Hasaud (Presiding Officer) Civil And Revenue District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

4. Smt. Hema Kumari W/o Shri Lalit Singh Sidar Aged About 26 Years Panch Ward No.1, Gram Panchayat Barduli, R/o Village Barduli,, Post Office Odekera, Police Station Hasaud, Tahsil Jaijaipur, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

5. Smt. Sagun Bai Karsh W/o Shri Shyamlal Karsh Aged About 43 Years Panch Ward No.2, Gram Panchayat Barduli, R/o Village Barduli,, Post Office Odekera, Police Station Hasaud, Tahsil Jaijaipur, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

6. Shri Hari Ram Khunte S/o Shri Kartik Ram Khunte Aged About 58 Years Panch Ward No.3, Gram Panchayat Barduli, R/o Village Barduli,, Post Office Odekera, Police Station Hasaud, Tahsil Jaijaipur, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

7. Shri Om Prakash Sahu S/o Shri Tiharu Ram Sahu Aged About 33 Years Panch Ward No.4, Gram Panchayat Barduli, R/o Village Barduli,, Post Office Odekera, Police Station Hasaud, Tahsil Jaijaipur, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

8. Shri Manoj Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Ramlal Sidar Aged About 30 Years Panch Ward No.5, Gram Panchayat Barduli, R/o Village Barduli,, Post Office Odekera, Police Station Hasaud, Tahsil Jaijaipur, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

9. Smt. Gurbari Dahariya W/o Shri Uvaram Dahariya Aged About 39 Years Panch Ward No.6, Gram Panchayat Barduli, R/o Village Tumidih, Post Office Odekera, Police Station Hasaud, Tahsil Jaijaipur, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 10.Smt. Rambai Mahant W/o Shri Harishankar Mahant Aged About 39 Years

Panch Ward No.7, Gram Panchayat Barduli, R/o Village Tumidih, Post Office Odekera, Police Station Hasaud, Tahsil Jaijaipur, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 11.Shri Ram Kumar Khande S/o Shri Chandram Khande Aged About 37 Years Panch Ward No.8, Gram Panchayat Barduli, R/o Village Tumidih, Post Office Odekera, Police Station Hasaud, Tahsil Jaijaipur, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 12.Smt. Risma Ratre W/o Shri Rajendra Ratre Aged About 25 Years Panch Ward No.9, Gram Panchayat Barduli, R/o Village Tumidih, Post Office Odekera, Police Station Hasaud, Tahsil Jaijaipur, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 13.Smt.

Yashoda Sonwani W/o Shri Bhojram Sonwani Aged About 34 Years Panch Ward No.

Mr. Ramesh Kumar Nayak, Advocate.

For Respondents :

Mr. Ashish Surana, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 18/06/18 1.

This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 08.01.2018 (Annexure - P/1) passed by respondent No. 1 whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Section 21(4) of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 has been rejected. 2.

Learned State counsel would submit that the order is revisable before the Commissioner under Chhattisgarh Panchayats (Appeal and Revision) Rules, 1995.

3.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 4.

Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to prefer revision before the Commissioner that will be considered and decided by the said authority expeditiously in accordance with law preferably within a period of two months from today.

5.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of with no order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka