Pradeep Paswan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 5108 of 2017

1. Pradeep Paswan S/o Late Shri Ramchandra Pawan, Aged about 40 Years, Working As Platoon Commander (One Time), At 18th Battalion, C.A.F., Manendragarh, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh

2. Raja Babu Jhadi S/o Shri Kanhaiya Jhadi, Aged About 38 Years Working As Platoon Commander (One Time), At 12th Battalion, C.A.F., Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh

3. Rohit Kunjam S/o Shri Lochan Ram Kunjam, Aged About 31 Years Working As Platoon Commander (One Time), At 1st Battalion, C.A.F., Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh

4. Jai Viresh Yadav S/o Shri Mohan Singh, Aged About 41 Years Working As Platoon Commander (One Time), At 13th Battalion, C.A.F., Bango, District Korba, Chhattisgarh

5. Adeshwar Sahu S/o Shri Tiharu Ram Sahu, Aged About 37 Years Working As Platoon Commander (One Time), At 11th Battalion, C.A.F., Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home (Police) Department, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director General Of Police, Chhattisgarh, Police Head Quarters, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Additional Director General Of Police, C A F, Police Head Quarters, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Inspector General Of Police, C A F, Police Head Quarters, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioners Mr. Sushil Dubey, Panel Lawyer For Respondent/State Mr. Ashutosh Pandey, Panel Lawyer

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 24/10/2017

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that since the matter relates to promotion to the post of Company Commander, for which, the petitioner is entitled, the writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to submit representations before the competent authority with further direction to the authority to decide the representations at the earliest.

3. Considering the entire facts situation of the case, the petitioner is permitted to move representations before the competent authority within a period of one month from today and thereafter, the competent authority shall decide the representations, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 3 months thereafter.

4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the petitioners' representations shall be decided strictly in accordance with law without treating any observations made in this order either for or against the petitioner.

5. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna