← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2933/2017disposed off

Atmaram Verma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-11-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2933 of 2017 Atmaram Verma S/o Shri Anant Ram Verma, Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Baiharsari, Post Sarangpur Kala, Tahsil Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, P. S. Rakhi, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Collector, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh

4. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh

5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh

6. Smt. Chailu Bai, Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Baiharsari, Janpad Panchayat Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh

7. Ram Lochan Verma, Secretary, Gram Panchayat Baiharsari, Janpad Panchayat Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh

8. Vaidya Raj Verma, Rojgar Sahayak, Gram Panchayat Baiharsari, Janpad Panchayat Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Roshan Dubey, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. Shashank Thakur, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 03/11/17 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the award passed by the Lokpal, MNREGA on 25.07.2017 recommending penalty against

respondents No. 6 to 8 has not been accepted by respondent No.4- SubDivisional Officer (Revenue) and no action has been taken against them till date.

2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.

Be that as it may, the respondents No. 3 and 4 are directed to proceed in accordance with law expeditiously as per the award dated 25.07.2017 subject to order of the Appellate or another competent authority. Till then, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner. 4.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka