← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/4090/2018allowed

Arjun @ Rajveer Soni v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-07-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 4090 of 2018 • Arjun @ Rajveer Soni S/o Santosh Soni, Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Talwapara, Shivnandanpur, Police Station Bishrampur, Tahsil And District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant

Versus

• State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Applicants : Mr. Anil Gulati, Advocate For State/respondent : Mrs. Smita Ghai, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order On Board 16/07/2018

1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on behalf of the applicant for grant of regular bail to him as he is in custody in connection with Crime No.132/2018, registered at Police Station-Surajpur, District-Surajpur(C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 509(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 12 of Protection of Children from

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. He is in jail since

21.5.2018. After completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been filed. No case is made out against him, hence, it is prayed that he may be released on regular bail.

3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail applications and the submission made in this respect.

4. I have heard the learned counsel for both the parties and perused the case diary.

5. According to prosecution case this applicant wanted to marry with the victim but his proposal was refused by the family members of the victim. Later on, this applicant used to threaten the victim and her parents that if the marriage of victim is negotiated with some other person he shall not let it happen and he will kill the family members of the victim, hence, the FIR has been lodged. Hence, this case.

6. Affter considering on all the material present in the case diary and the trial against this applicant to take some time for its conclusion, for this reason, I am of this view that this is a fit case where the applicant should be released on bail.

7. Accordingly, the bail applications filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. are allowed. It is directed that applicants shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, for his appearance as and when directed.

Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge Nisha