Ishwar Prasad Dewangan v. Dinesh Shrivastava And ANR.

$§§E§E§ gmagk

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH

AT BILASPUR CONTEMPT CAsE CIVIL No.

5%© OF 2013 PETITONER </ Ishwar Prasad Dewangan, S/o La're Shri Tarachand Dewangan, aged about 62 years, Retired Principal m'

Govt High School Laripani, P.S.

(Se BlockLailunga, Civil & Revenue DIS'H'.

Raigar'h (C.G.) a'r pr'esem'ly residing af village and posT Saragaon, Via-Bamdwar', P.S.- Saragaon, BlockBamhnidih, Civil & Revenue Dis'r'r.

Janjgir-Champa (6.6.)

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS/ 1.

Dinesh Shrivasfava, CONTEMNORs Public Direc'l'or'

Instruction/ Secre'rary EducaTion Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Dis'r'r. Raipur (C.G.) 2.

Sa'rish Pandey, DislricT Officer, Educa'rion Dis'rricf Janjgir-Champa (C.G.)

l CONTEMPT PETITION UNDER SECTIONfIZ OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT READ WITH AR'ITCLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA _ /

\ 0/ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Contempt Case (C) No.580 of 2013 Ishwar Prasad Dewangan Petitioner

Versus

Respondents 1.

Dinesh Shrivastava 2.

Satish Pandey (Contempt Petition under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India) K"

Mr.Anii Singh Rajput; counsel for the petitioner. (SB:

Hon'ble Mr. T.P. Sharma, J.)

ORDER

(1 -1 -2014) 1.

By this contempt case the petitioner has prayed for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 26.6.2013 passed in" W.P. (S) No.1802 of 2013. 2.

i have heard Iearned counsel for the petitioner, perused the petition and documents appended thereto.

3.

In absence of any material to show the inaction of the respondents, the contempt case is dismissed summarily reserving liberty to the petitioner to tile afresh if cause survives along with materiai showing the inaction of the respondents, especially in the era of Right to Information Act. '

I Sd/- '

T. P. Sharma Judge 114.2