High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4846/2019disposed off

Nehru Soni v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-07-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4846 of 2019 Nehru Lal Soni S/o Late Shri Shyamlal Soni Aged About 46 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Grade - III, Tahsil Office Kansabel, District Jashpur Chhattisgahr. R/o H-60/1, Civil Lines, Indra Deepa, Near Wireless Tower Jashpur, District Jadhpur Chhattisgarh., District : Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through, The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Collector Jashpur, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh.

3. Tahsildar Tahsil Kansabel, District Jashpur Chhattisgarh. ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Abhishek Saraf, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. P. Acharya, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 02/07/2019

1. The counsel for the petitioner makes an oral request for carrying out necessary amendment during the course of the day. As prayed, the request is allowed and let necessary amendment be carried out during the course of the day, with the consent of the parties, the matter was heard finally and disposed off at motion stage itself.

2. The claim of the petitioner in the present writ petition is for grant of time bound pay-scale.

3. According to the petitioner, the persons juniors to the petitioner have been granted the same but for no reason or atleast no reason has been given to the petitioner as to why he has been denied the same. He further refers to Annexure P/2, it is an order where the persons junior to the petitioner have been granted time bound pay-scale.

4. It is further contended by the petitioner that he has made detailed representation in this regard to the respondent No. 2 which till date has not been decided and makes a prayer that the respondent No. 2 be directed to decide the same.

5. State Counsel does not oppose to the limited prayer that the petitioner has made

6. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, let the respondent No. 2 take a decision on the representation which the petitioner has made so far as granting of time bound pay-scale is concerned.

7. Let a decision be taken on the claim of the petitioner at the earliest preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

8. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Jyotijha