Smt.Geeta Chatterjee And ORS. v. Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation Parivahan Prabhag And ANR.
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
yam ;
w f'
Cf:
@ gr?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTIGARH AT BILASPUR
Wok!
WRIT PETITION§ No.
OF 2013 PETITIONERS :
Smt. Geeta Chatterjee W/o Late Manmohan Chatterjee 57 ycars Waterman, Ambikapur Depot, R/o Kabir Ward No. 38, Darripara, Ambikapur Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) Shri Prem Kumar Mishra S/o Late Prayag Narayan Mishra, 55 years Driver Ambikapur Depot, R/o Ring Road Darridand Ambikapur Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) Arvind Kumar Gupta S/ o Late Ganga Prasad Gupta aged 51 years, Conductor, Ambikapur Depot, R/o Post Gangapur Khurd Ambikapur Distt. Sarguja (C.G.) Shri Keshav Prasad Shukla S/o Ram Bahal Shukla aged 61 years Cashier, Ambikapur Depot, R/ o Rajya Parivahan Colony, B2, Behiee Bagicha, Babu Para, Ambikapur Distt.
Sarguja (C.G.) Shri B.L. Verma S/ o Late Shri Miluram Verma, aged 56 years Security Guard, Ambikapur Depot, R/ o Rajya Parivahan Colony Room No. C 6 Babu Para, Ambikapur Dist. Sarguja (C.G.) Shri Jawahar Singh S/o Shri Shiv Mohan Singh 56 years Conductor, Ambikapur Depot, R/o
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
ax HIGH COURT OF CHHA'ITISGARH BILASPUR SINGLE BENCH HON'BLE SHRI PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J.
W.P. (S) No. 4404 of2o13~ PETITIONERS Smt. Geeta Chatterjee and others.
Versus
RESPONDENTS Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation (Transport Section) and another.
Shri Vivek Agarwal, counsel for petitioners.
Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate with Shri S.K.' Dewangan counsei for the respondent No.1, on advance copy.
ORAL ORDER (01/01/2014) Petitioners have preferred this writ petition seeking direction to the respondents-authorities to properly compute the statutory interest on the amount impounded in the EDF components known in the jargon of the Corporation as 23%, 34% and 17% of DA to be calcuiated in the manner prescribed for General Provident Fund Accounts with further prayer to decide their cases as per the decision passed by this Court in the matter of G.K.
Gupta Vs. The Managing Director & Others, WP.(S) No. 6510/2009 together with other connected matters decided on 04/07/2011 and Writ Appeal 'No.
41 9/2011 together with other Writ Appeal decided on 16'" July, 2012. 2.
Upon hearing learned counsel for the petitioners and on perusal of the judgment rendered by the Single Bench and Division Bench of this Court, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present writ petition in the same terms.
3.
Petitioners would be at liberty to move representation before the Madhya Pradesh Road Transport Corporation before whom the claim of the previous set of petitioner namely G.K. Gupta and others is under process.
On submission of representation by the petitioners within a period of one month, the same shall be verified and if their cases are similar to the previous set of petitioners, their claim shall also be processed along with the claims of the petitioners of previous writ petitions in the matter of G.K. Gupta (supra).
'
Sd//- K Prashant Kumar Mishita Judge