← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4050/2018disposed off

Ku. Tupti Pagare v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-06-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4050 of 2018 1.

Ku. Tupti Pagare D/o Shri Krishna Pagare, Aged About 37 Years Presently Working As Training Officer At Govt. I.T.I. Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

2.

Smt. Sita, W/o Shri Gajendra Bharti, Aged About 32 Years Presently Working As Training Officer At Govt. I.T.I. Berla, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh.

3.

Smt. Dharna Sahu, W/o Shri Ved Prakash Sahu, Aged About 32 Years Presently Working As Training Officer At Govt. I.T.I. Kareli Bodi, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.

4.

Ku. Bhanumati Thakur, D/o Shri Govind Thakur, Aged About 36 Years Presently Working As Training Officer At Govt. I.T.I. Magarlod, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.

5.

Ku. Jyotsana Sahare, D/o Shri Mansingh Sahare, Aged About 42 Years Presently Working As Training Officer At Govt. I.T.I. Tilda, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

6.

Jayant Kumar Sahu, S/o Shri Arjun Singh Sahu, Aged About 40 Years Presently Working As Training Officer At Govt. Model I.T.I. Nari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.

7.

Sushil Kumar Khutte S/o Shri Chhote Lal Khutte, Aged About 33 Years Presently Working As Training Officer At Govt. I.T.I. Kartala, District Korba Chhattisgarh.

8.

Suresh Kumar Sahu, S/o Shri Fulchand Sahu, Aged About 34 Years Presently Working As Training Officer At Govt. I.T.I. Khamhariya, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

9.

Chandra Kumar Yadav, S/o Shri Chhattar Singh Yadav, Aged About 30 Years Presently Working As Training Officer At Govt. Model I.T.I. Koni, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

10. Soni Kumar Sidar S/o Shri Saharta Ram Sidar, Aged About 33 Years Presently Working As Training Officer At Govt. I.T.I. Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh.

11. Yamraj Kumar Maravi, S/o Shri Dubraj Singh Maravi, Aged About 44 Years Presently Working As Training Officer At Govt. I.T.I. Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh.

12. Sanjay Kumar Sarthi, S/o Shri Ram Kumar Sarthi, Aged About 31 Years Presently Working As Training Officer And Posted At Govt. I.T.I. Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh.

13. Anurag Kumar Tiwari, S/o Shri Ram Kumar Tiwari, Aged About 37 Years Presently Working As Training Officer At Govt. Model I.T.I. Koni, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

14. Prashanna Kumar Pandey, S/o Shri B.N. Pandey, Aged About 34 Years Presently Working As Training Officer At Govt. I.T.I. Chirmiri, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh.

15. Kuleshwar Prasad, S/o Shri Budhram Singh Aged About 32 Years Presently Working As Training Officer At Govt. I.T.I. Geedam, District Dantewada, Chhattisgarh.

16. Smt. Ranu Verma, W/o Shri Ashok Kumar Verma, Aged About 33 Years Presently Working As Training Officer At Govt. I.T.I. Balodabazar, District Bhatapara Balodabazar Chhattisgarh.

17. Smt. Neetudan, W/o Shri Amrit Lal Rathor, Aged About 38 Years Presently Working As Training Officer At Govt. I.T.I. Geedam, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Skill Development, Technical Education And Employment, Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Director, Employment And Training, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate.

For Respondents : Shri Dheeraj Wankhede, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board 19.06.2018

1. The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking direction to the respondent No. 2 to consider their case and pass appropriate order for confirmation in their service.

2. The petitioners are working as Training Officer in Government I.T. I.s of different districts. They were appointed in the year 2013. Their probation period was of two years. After, lapse of two years they

have not been confirmed. Now, they have completed near about 5 years of service.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned State counsel are agreed that the issue involved in the present case is squarely covered in the order dated 01.05.2018 passed in Writ Petition (S) No. 3447 of 2018.

4. Looking to the submissions of both the parties, facts and circumstances of the case, and aforesaid order, this writ petition is disposed of, with the direction that the petitioners may file individual representation within 15 days from the date of this order for their claim of confirmation in the service before respondent No. 2 and respondent No.2, in turn, shall decide the representations, so received, within a period of 3 months from the date of filing of such representations.

5. This Court does not make any comment on merits of the case. Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) JUDGE kishore