Pustam Yadav And ORS. v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C.No.1133 of 2016

1. Pustam Yadav S/o Hariwansh Yadav, Aged about 20 years, R/o VillageGohrapadar, Police Station-Deobhog, District-Gariyaband (CG)

2. Hemlal Yadav S/o Roopdhar Yadav, Aged about 35 years, R/o villageDharnidhoda, Police Station-Deobhog, District-Gariyaband (CG)

3. Nahal Dhruw S/o Lakhidhar Dhruw, Aged about 30 years, R/o villageSalhebhata, Police Station-Deobhog, District-Gariyaband (CG) ---Applicants

Versus

State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station-Mainpur, District-Raipur (CG) ---Non-applicant For Applicants :

Mr. Shashi Kushwaha, Advocate For Non-applicant :

Mr. Vivek Shinghal, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 10/03/2016 1.

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.77/2015, registered at Police StationMainpur, District-Gariyaband (CG), for the offence punishable under Sections 457 and 380/34 of the IPC.

2.

After hearing learned counsel appearing for the parties and taking into consideration the facts & circumstances of the case, nature & gravity of the offence and the manner in which the applicants have stolen laptop, charger and mobile worth `33,500/- from the house of Benipuri Goswami and subsequent recovery, I do not find any ground for grant of bail to the applicants. Consequently, bail application is rejected. However, the trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE B/-