Daya Ram Kumhar v. Chairman Cum Managing Director

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Appeal No. 353 of 2020

1. Daya Ram Kumhar S/o Shri Muniya Kumar Aged About 44 Years Posted As Foreman R/o Qr. No. 57, Rajgamar Colliery Post Rajgamar Korba East, Tahsil And District Korba Chhattisgarh.

2. Firatram S/o Dhanshay Aged About 50 Years Post Clipman R/o Qr. No. Dm 69, Rajgamar Colliery, Post Rajgamar Korba East, Tahsil And District Korba Chhattisgarh.

3. Shankerlal S/o Sadhram Aged About 46 Years Post Support Mistri , R/o Qr. No. M 840, Ompur Colliery, Post Rajgamar Korba East, Tahsil And District Korba Chhattisgarh.

4. Amarnath S/o Kaleshwar Aged About 51 Years Post Fitter, R/o Qr. No. M/304, Ompur Rajgamar Colliery , Post Rajgamar Korba East , Tahsil And District Korba Chhattisgarh.

---- Appellants

Versus

1. Chairman Cum Managing Director SECL, South Eastern Coalfields Limited Head Office, Sipat Road Bilaspur , Police Station Sarkanda , Bilaspur , District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

2. Chief General Manager SECL Korba, Area (East), G.M. Office, Korba (East), District Korba Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Personnel Manager SECL , Korba, Korba Area (East), G.M. Office , Korba (East) District Korba Chhattisgarh.

4. Chief Finance Manager SECL , Korba, G.M. Office , Korba East District Korba Chhattisgarh.

5. Sub Area Manager Rajgamar, SECL Post Rajgamar, Korba (East), District Korba Chhattisgarh.

6. Sub Area Manager SECL, Dhelwadih, Post Dhelwadih, Korba (West), District Korba Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents (Cause Title taken from Case Information System) For Appellant : Mr. S.V.Purohit, Advocate.

For Respondents : Mr. Adil Minhaj, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.

Judgment on Board Per Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice 26/10/2021 Heard Mr. S.V.Purohit, learned counsel for the appellants as well as Shri Adil Minhaj, learned counsel for the respondents. 2.

This appeal is presented against an order dated 10.01.2020 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (S) No. 1659 of 2013, whereby, the writ petition in which a prayer was made to direct the respondents to release travelling allowance to the petitioners, was dismissed.

3.

Writ Petition (S) No. 1659 of 2013 was filed by 18 writ petitioners. The present appeal is filed by four of the writ petitioners in Writ Petition (S) No. 1659 of 2013.

4.

It has been brought to our notice that assailing the very same judgment as is impugned in the present appeal, a writ appeal, registered as Writ Appeal No. 308 of 2020, was presented by 12 of the writ petitioners and this Court, by an order dated 13.07.2020, finding no merit, had dismissed the said writ appeal. 5.

We have perused the order passed by this Court in Writ Appeal No. 308 of 2020.

6.

This appeal is dismissed in terms of the order dated 13.07.2020 passed in Writ Appeal No. 308 of 2020.

Sd/- Sd/- (Arup Kumar Goswami) (Sanjay K. Agrawal) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE Amit