Golu @ Traymbakeshwar Goswami v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C. No. 822 OF 2016 Golu @ Traymbakeshwar Goswami S/o Roop Vilash Goswami, aged about 23 years, R/o Saraipali, Police Station Pali, Civil and Revenue District Korba (C.G.) ---Applicant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, through Station House Officer, Police of Police Station Torwa, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ---Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Atul Pandey, Advocate For-Non-applicant : Mr. Adhiraj Surana, Dy. G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 01/03/2016 1.
This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 14/2015, registered at Police Station Torwa, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Sections 379, 414, 420 of
Indian Penal Code.
2.
Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, applicant changed Chassis number of the stolen motorcycle owned by Govind Rajak and thereby committed aforesaid offence.
3.
Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that applicant has not committed any offence and has been falsely implicated in the case. He would further submit that applicant is in jail since 28/10/2015 and no useful purpose would be served by keeping him in jail. He would lastly submit that charge sheet has been filed, therefore, he may be released on bail.
4.
On the other hand, learned State counsel would oppose the prayer for grant of bail.
5.
I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary.
6.
Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case; further taking into consideration the nature and gravity of offence and role
of the applicant, this Court is not inclined to release the applicant on regular bail.
7.
Accordingly, bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is rejected.
8.
Certified copy as per rules.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Tiwari