Ramji Manikpuri And Another v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS

GE P («W (Q?

(4

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATI'ISGARH

AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) N0.

Q9 § /2014 PETITIONERS 1] Ramji Manikpuri, S/o.

Kartik Manikpuri, aged about 6o years, R/o.

Nutan Chowk, Sarkanda, Police Station and Post Sarkanda, Civil and Revenue District Bilaspur (C.G.) Punni Bai, W/o. Ramji Manikpuri, aged about years, R/o.

Nutan Chowk, Sarkanda, Police Station and Post Sarkanda, Civil and Revenue District Bilaspur (C.G.)

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS 1] State of Chhattisgarh, Through:

Secretary, Urban Administration Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, through: its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh Union of India, through;

Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Urban Property Alleviation, New Delhi, INDIA 4] WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA RLMV

m %m magma"

WWW mmHf'Eam m@jr $aimwé¥r '

SB. Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashz ant Kumar Mishra 18-2-2015 n Shrr Mam] Paranjape Ac 'vocate forthe petitioner, Shri Aru 'Sao Dy Adv General forthe S [ate and Ms. Pushpa DWivedi, Adv.

for the respondent Corporation.

Shri Paranjape, learned c )unsel pleads no instruciions in the matter.

'ing.to press is writ petition.

th No other counsel is appea ln the circumstances, th re is no other option left with the Court but to dismiss the petition f r want of prosecution) Accordingly;

the writ p tition is dismissed for want 'of prosecution.

Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Jude g