← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2935/2017disposed off

Lakkhi Chand Sidara v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-11-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2935 of 2017

1. Lakkhi Chand Sidara S/o Shri Bhagwan Das Sidara, Aged about 54 years, R/o Near Dhan Mandi, Torwa Bilaspur Police Station - Torwa Tahsil Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. Mo. No. 9300328650

2. Anil Kumar Sidara S/o Shri Bhagwan Das Sidara, Aged about 50 years, R/o Near Dhan Mandi, Torwa Bilaspur Police Station - Torwa Tahsil Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. Mo. No. 9300095711

3. Sunil Kumar Sidara S/o Shri Bhagwan Das Sidara, Aged about 43 years, R/o Near Dhan Mandi, Torwa Bilaspur Police Station - Torwa Tahsil Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. Mo. No. 9300758811 ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Urban Administration & Development Department Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Raipur Police Station Kewli, Tahsil Civil & Revenue District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Commissioner, Municipl Corporation Bilaspur, Police Station Civil Lines, Tahsil, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Agrawal, Advocate.

For Respondent No. 2 :

Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Shashank Thakur, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 03/11/17 1.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would submit that without demarcation of the petitioner's building and without affording any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the respondent No. 2- Corporation has orally instructed to demolish petitioner's building. 2.

Learned counsel appearing for Corporation would submit that as and when action will be taken for demolishing the building of the petitioner, notice

will be served to the petitioner and after hearing the petitioner, the Corporation will proceed further.

3.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 4.

In view of the above submissions, it is directed that the Corporation would provide opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before proceeding against the petitioner and the status-quo as on today shall be maintained till then.

5.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of at this stage. No order as to cost(s).

SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka