Dhaniram Gadhewal v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1657 of 2018
1. Dhaniram Gadhewal S/o Late Sukhram Gadhewal, aged about 56 years, R/o House No. 64, Beside Railway Line Ram Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
2. Smt. Rimmi Bai Gadhewal W/o Late Sukhram Gadhewal, aged about 78 years, R/o House No. 64, Beside Railway Line Ram Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Town and Country Planning, Housing Environment, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
2. Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
3. Joint Director, Town and Country Planning Department, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
4. The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division No. 1, District Raipur (C.G.)
5. Municipal Corporation, Through Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Zone No. 8, Mahoba Bazar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioners :
Mr. Akash Pandey, Advocates.
For Respondents / State :
Mr. P. K. Bhaduri, G. A.
For Respondent No. 5 :
Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 22/06/18 1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that petitioners have been served with notice dated 13.04.2018 (Annexure - P/3) by the Municipal Corporation, Raipur for taking over their land for construction of road but neither compensation is being paid nor their land has been demarcated. 2.
Be that as it may, the respondents No. 2 & 5 are directed to examine the case of the petitioners' strictly in accordance with law and decide the
same expeditiously preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. If the petitioners' land is being taken then the respondent authorities shall proceed further in accordance with the relevant Law and consider and dispose of the proceeding within two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Meanwhile, no construction should be made on the petitioners' land for the period of two months. 3.
With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).
SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka