High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3013/2015withdrawn

Hetram Karsh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-08-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3013 of 2015 • Hetram Karsh S/o Shri Tirath Ram Karsh, Aged About 45 Years Mail Rural Health Coordinator, Sub Health Central Bilaspur (Bilaeegarh) Civil & Revenue District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Health & Family Welfare, Ministry, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Director, Directorate of Health Services, Health & Family Welfare Department, Indravati Bhavan, 3rd Floor, Block No. 1, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. District Collector, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Medical Officer, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Neeraj Choubey, Advocate For Respondents-State :

Shri YS Thakur, Dy. AG for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 19/08/2015

1. In this petition, the petitioner, who is working as Male Rural Health Coordinator in the Balodabazar-Bhatapara District, has challenged the transfer order dated 20.07.2015, whereby he has been transfered from Community Health Centre Bilaspur (Bilaeegarh) District- BalodabazarBhatapara to the office of Block Medical Officer, Bhatapara on administrative grounds.

2. In view of the Clause 4 of the State Government's transfer policy dated 1-72015 for the year 2015-16, on the request made by learned counsel for the

petitioner, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue the representation.

3. The authority before whom the representation lies under clause 4 of the transfer policy dated 1-7-2015 shall take the decision in the matter at the earliest, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.

4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra ashu