Ultratech Cement Limited v. Union Of India
-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPT No. 84 of 2020
1. Ultratech Cement Limited, A company registered under the provision of the Companies Act, 1956 and having its registered office at 'B' Wing, Ahura Centre, 2nd Floor, Mahakali Caves Road, Andheri (East) Mumbai - 400093 (Maharashtra) and a Cement plant/Unit at Rawan Cement Works Rawan, Pin - 493 198 Dist. Baloda Bazar, (C.G.) through its authorized representative.
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Income Tax Department, North Block, New Delhi -110001
2. Commissioner of Income Tax, Government of India, Central Revenue Building, Civil Lines, Raipur 492001 (C.G)
3. Asstt./Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Government of India, Central Revenue Building, Civil Lines, Raipur 492 001 (C.G)
4. State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Department of Geology & Mining, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur (C.G.)
5. Director, Directorate of Geology & Mining, Indrawati Bhawan Naya Raipur, Raipur (C.G.)
6. Mining Officer, (Mining & Admn.) Collectorate Premises, Mining Office, Baloda Bazar, District : Baloda Bazar -Bhatapara, (C.G)
7. Dy. Director (Mining & Admin), Mining Office, District: Baloda BazarBhatapara, Chhattisgarh. ------ Respondents For Petitioner :
Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate.
For State :
Mr. Siddharth Dubey, Dy. Govt. Advocate.
For Union of India :
Ms. Poornima, Singh, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 18.09.2020
1. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition seems to be primarily the inaction on the part of the respondent-State
-2particularly, the Mining Department in not considering the request of the petitioner's establishment for refund/adjustment of certain tax liability on the Mining Department towards Income Tax Department which has been discharged by the petitioner.
2. The counsel for the petitioner submits that they had received notices from the Income Tax Department under the provisions of 226 (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, based upon which subsequently, the petitioner has deposited an amount of Rs. 1,62,39,772/- to the Income Tax Department. That the Income Tax Department in turn has intimated the Mining Department in-respect-of the same vide their correspondence dated 03.03.2020 Annexure P-8.
3. Since then, the petitioner has been making repeated representations to the Mining Department for adjustment of the aforesaid amount or refund of the said amount to the petitioner. However, till date no decision has been taken by the respondents i.e., Mining Department.
4. Given the said factual matrix of the case and the repeated representations of the petitioner pending before the respondentsState, this Court is of the opinion that the ends of justice would meet, if the writ petition is disposed off at this juncture with a direction to the Respondents No. 4 to 7 to take a decision and communicate the same to the petitioner within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt of copy of this Order.
5. With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition stands disposed off.
Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rahul