Smt.Leela Sinha v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JuSJCATUREAT ^ILASPUR (C.G.J

M.C.C. Np. ' /^/2(U4 (ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATEDA9.03.2014 PASSED BY HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN W.P.(S) No. 1320/2014) APPLICANT:

Smt. Leela Sinha Aged about 39 years, W/o. Shri Hemlal Sinha R/o. Village Atarmara, P.0. Atarmara, Police Station - Rajim, Tahsil - Chhura, District-Raipur (C.G.) ^.v

Versus

RESPONDENTS 1.

The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Govt.

of Chhaftisgarh, Department of Panchayat & Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, P.S. Mandir Hasaud, Raipur (C.G.)

2. The Collector, District-Gariyaband (C.G.)

3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat - Chhura, District-Gariyaband (C.G.)

4. The Block Education Officer, Block-Chhura, District-Gariyaband (C.G.) APPLICATION FOR MODIFICATION IN THE

ORDER

DATED 19.03.20f4 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE COURT PASSED IN W.P.(S) No.

1320/2014 (SMT.

LEELA SINHA VS.

STATE OF C.G.

& OTHERS).

"-

\^.

» 'A ^ ^ /^

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR

DIVISION BENCH HON'BLE MR.T.P. SHARMA. & HON'BLE MR. C.B. BAJPAI. JJ M.C.C.No. 995 of 2014 Petitioner Smt. Leela Singh versus Respondents 1.

The State of Chhattisgarh.

2.

The Cotlector, District Gariyaband.

3.

The Chief Executive Officer, Chhura, District Gariyaband.

4.

The Block Education Officer, Chhura, District Gariyaband.

APPLICATION FOR MODIFICATION OF ORDER DATED 19.03.2014 PASSEDIN W.P.(S)NO. 1320/2014 '-^•"-^^ii^'- Appearance:

Mr. SanjeerSahLi, eounsel for the petitioner. Ms. Pustip^ Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for the State. OR DER (20.01.2015) T.P. SHARMA. J Heard.

This is petition for modification of order dated 19.03.2014 1.

passed in W.P.(S)No.1320 of 2014 by the learned Single Judge.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondents 2.

have not decided the representation filed on behalf of the petitioner till today, therefore, some time limit be fixed.

3.

Respondent authorities are under obligation to act in accordance with law and also respect the order of the High Court.

4.

With these obse;rvations, the petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs.

Sd/- C. B. Bajpai Judge Sd/- T.P. Sharma Judge