← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/5741/2015rejected

Dilip @ Ramkrishna Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-11-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 5741 of 2015 Dilip @ Ramkrishna Sahu S/o. Pardeshi, aged about 28 years, R/oVillage Dhourabhatha, Police Station and Tahsil Lormi, Civl and Revenue District - Mungeli (Chhattisgarh).

---- Applicant

Versus

State of Chhattisgarh Through :- Police Station Lormi, District Mungeli (Chhattisgarh).

---- Respondent For Applicant :- Shri Ravish Verma, Advocate For Respondent/ State :- Shri Anupam Dubey, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board By 30/11/2015 1.

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 246/2015 registered at Police Station- Lormi District Mungeli (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 304- B /34 and in alternate 302/34 of IPC.

2.

As per the prosecution case, the deceased Vimla Bai committed suicide by handing herself within the 7 months of the marriage. It is contended that the specific demand of money was made by the applicant and it was not fulfilled by the deceased and on the basis of which when it became unbearable she had committed suicide on 05.05.2015. Subsequently, on the complaint the present applicant has been arrested on 29.05.2015.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the other coaccused have been enlarged on bail and the case of the present applicant is similar to the other five accused. He further submits that the charge sheet in this case has already been filed. 4.

Learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail. 5.

Having gone through the statement of the father of the deceased wherein the specific allegations made against the present applicant that he demanded the amount on phone. Considering the specific allegations against the applicant, this Court is of the opinion, that present is not a fit case, in which, the applicant should be enlarged on regular bail.

6.

Accordingly, the application for bail is rejected. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Santosh