Harshita Verma v. National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test ( Nnet)

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1624 of 2018 • Harshita Verma D/o Vijay Babu Verma, Aged About 18 1⁄2, R/o H.No. 32, Vaishnavi Vihar, Phase I, Uslapur, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) Unit, Central Board Of Secondary Education (CBSE), Through Its Director (NEET), Shiksha Kendra - 2, Community Center, Preet Vihar, Delhi - 110092

2. Director, National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test (NEET) Unit, Central Board Of Secondary Education (CBSE), Shiksha Kendra - 2, Community Center, Preet Vihar, Delhi - 110092

3. Deputy Secretary, National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test (NEET) Unit, Central Board Of Secondary Education (CBSE), Shiksha Kendra - 2, Community Center, Preet Vihar, Delhi - 110092

4. The Assistant Director, General (ME), Directorate of General Of Health Services, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi - 110108 -----Respondents --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Shri Shantanu Paramanand, Advocate For Respondents : None appears --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri PR Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice & Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board Per PR Ramachandra Menon,CJ 21.01.2020 1.

Petitioner's prayers are in the following terms: i. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to summon the original answer sheet of NEET 2018 of the petitioner along with the answer key of the CBSE (NEET) for kind perusal. ii. That this Hon'ble Court may kindly bhe pleased to direct the respondent authorities to forthwith correct the result of the petitioner and award proper marks of NEET 2018 to her, after due evaluation and also place the name of the petitioner at an appropriate place of the rank chart.

wpc 1624 of 2018 iii. Cost of the petition may also be granted to the petitioner. iv. Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper, may also kindly be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the turn of events, the matter has become infructuous.

3.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Sd/- Sd/- (PR Ramachandra Menon) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge padma