Ram Avatar Agrawal v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.3153 of 2017
1. Ram Avatar Agrawal S/o Late Shri Suwalal Agrawal Aged About 52 Years R/o Mahadev Ghat Road Lakhe Nagar Raipur Tahsil & District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2. Narayan Agrawal S/o Birdichand Agrawal Aged About 40 Years R/o R. S. Shukla Road Raipur Tahsil & District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Urban Administration And Development Department Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya New Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2. The Collector, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh .
3. The Raipur Development Authority , Through Its Chief Executive Officer Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
4. The Joint Director Nagar And Gram Nivesh Regional Office, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
5. The Revenue Officer , Raipur Development Authority , Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
--- Respondents For Petitioner :Mr. Dhirendra Prasad Mishra, Advocate For State :Mr. Arun Sao, Deputy Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 28/11/2017 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners' land has been acquired by respondent No.3Raipur Development Authority under Section 56 of the Chhattisgarh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973, but neither valuation of the suit land has been done properly according to market value nor compensation has been given to the petitioner for which they have
made several representations before the respondent authorities, but the same have not been considered and decided till this date , hence this petition.
(2) Be that as it may, the petitioners are at liberty to file fresh representation before respondent No.3 supported by valuation report of the suit land according to market value. If such representation is filed by the petitioners before the respondent No.3, in that event respondent No.3 shall consider and decide the representation expeditiously within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of representation.
(3) With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-