← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCONT/483/2019withdrawn

R. S. Bhakuni v. Rita Shandilya

2019-08-08Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 483 of 2019

1. R. S. Bhakuni S/o Late Shri T.S. Bhakuni Aged About 51 Years Shri Villa, Near Vijay Nagar Chowk, Vijaynagar, P.O. Shankar Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Pin- 492007.

2. B. B. Tiwari S/o B. P. Tiwari Aged About 55 Years R/o Bauripara, Near Kerosine Depot, District- Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Surendra Kumar Shukla S/o Late Shri Ramnath Shukla Aged About 54 Years R/o B-2, Kalindi Kunj, Gaurav Path, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Amitabh Sharma S/o Shri M.P. Sharma Aged About 47 Years R/o 25/127, Jagannath Bhawan, Bhraman Para, Disrtict- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. Rita Shandilya Secretary, General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Ankit Anand Ceo Cum Director Chhattisgarh State Renewable Energy Development Agency, Through Director Vip (Airport Road), Near Urja Park, Village- Fudhar, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents ________________________________________________________________ For Petitioners : Shri Kishore Bhaduri and Shri Pankaj Singh, Advocates For Respondents : Shri Gagan Tiwari, Advocate _________________________________________________________________ Hon'ble Shri P. R. Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board P. R. Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice 08.08.2019 1.

When the matter is taken up for consideration with regard to the points raised as to the alleged contemptuous action on the part of the Respondents in not giving effect to the directions given by this Court, in particular paragraph-3 of the judgement dated 04.02.2019 and on confronting the Petitioners as to how that would constitute the alleged offence of contempt, learned counsel for the Petitioners seeks for

permission to withdraw this petition without prejudice to the rights and liberties of the Petitioner to pursue other remedies available under the law. 2.

Permission is granted.

3.

The contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid.

Sd/- Sd/- (P.R. Ramachandra Menon) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge Anu