Narsingh Baghel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4012 of 2015

1. Narsingh Baghel son of Shri Tatiram Baghel, aged about 43 years, working as Assistant Teacher Panchayat, Primary School, Musaguda, Block Darbha, District Bastar (C.G.).

2. Shyam Kunwar Uike wife of Shri Peelaram Uike, aged about 59 years, working as Assistant Teacher Panchayat, Primary School, Devnathpara, Block Darbha, District Bastar (C.G.)

3. Rajesh Kumar Dwivedi son of Shri Chandra Bhushan Dwivedi, Assistant Teacher Panchayat, Primary School, Kelaur, Block Darbha, District Bastar (C.G.)

4. Suresh Kumar Yadav son of late Devnath Yadav, aged about 37 years, working as Assistant Teacher Panchayat, Primary School, Kodabhata, Block-Darbha, District Bastar (C.G.)

5. Smt. Mangli Ponyami wife of Shro Phool Singh Podyami, aged about 38 years, working ass Assistant Teacher Panchayat, Primary School, Manjhipara, Block-Darbha, District-Bastar (C.G.)

6. Smt. Bharti Kashyap wife of Shri Meghnath Kashyap, aged about 41 years, working as Assistant Teacher Panchayat, Primary School, Dhurras Block-Darbha, District -Bastar (C.G.) ---Petitioners

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur (C.G.) 2.

The District Education Officer, Bastar, District Bastar (C.G.) 3.

The Block Education Officer, Darbha, District-Bastar (C.G.) 4.

The Audit Officer, Zila Panchayat, Bastar, District Bastar (C.G.)

5.

The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Bastar, District Bastar (C.G.) 6.

The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Darbha, District Bastar (C.G.).

----Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Mr. Ajeet Singh, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 04/11/2015 1.

Learned State counsel would submit that in view of the order passed by the Division Bench in Writ Appeal No. 227 of 2015 'Anil Kumar Ramtake and others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others' and other connected matters vide order dated 23/04/2015 and the subsequent circular issued by the State Government on 28/04/2015 petitioners entitlement for Kramonnati Vetanman shall be considered in accordance with law for the period 01/11/2011 to 30/04/2013.

2.

In view of the above, petitioners' case may be examined in accordance with the State Government circular dated 28/04/2015 and necessary orders may be passed within a period of three months from the date of submission of fresh representation by the petitioners subject to verification with regard to service record/eligibility. 3.

The petition is disposed off in the above terms. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE Tiwari