High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6627/2017disposed off

Anup Kumar Dewangan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-11-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 6627 of 2017 • Anup Kumar Dewangan S/o Shree Khagesh Chandra Dewangan, Aged About 39 Years R/o Chakradharnagar, Banglapara, Raigarh, Tehsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. Posted As Lecturer(Panchayat) At Government High School, Buldega, Block And Tehsil Patthalgaon, District Jushpur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Director, Panchayat And Rural Development, Collectorate, Kachahari Chowk, Near Gardan, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Executive OfÏcer, Zila Panchayat, Jashpur, Tehsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Chief Executive OfÏcer, Zila Panchayat, Raigarh, Tehsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent For Petitioner Mr. Mahendra Dubey, Advocate For Respondent /State Mr. Adhiraj Surana, Dy. GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 29/11/2017

1. Heard.

2. It is argued that the petitioner, who is working as Lecturer (Panchayat), within the jurisdiction of Zila Panchayat, Jashpur is

suffering from acute spinal cord problem (Prolapse of L4-L5), therefore, he made an application for his transfer to his native place at Raigarh, however, the same was rejected on 4.12.2015 by the CEO, Zila Panchayat, Jashpur.

3. The petitioner had already preferred WPS No.501/2016, which came to be disposed of on 22.2.2016 directing the CEO, Zila Panchayat, Jashpur to take a decision on his application.

4. Mr. Mahendra Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that on the date of passing of the said order dated 22.2.2016, the petitioner was not aware that his application has already been rejected. He submits that the petitioner is willing to move a fresh application before the Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development so that the matter is considered at the appropriate level.

5. The petitioner is at liberty to move an application before the Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development and if such application is moved, the same shall be considered by the said authority in accordance with law.

6. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna