Essar Power Transmission Company Limited v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet W.P.(C) No. 1637 of 2018

1. Essar Power Transmission Company Limited A Company Incorporated Under The Provisions Of Companies Act, 1956 And Having Its Registered Office At Lower Ground Floor, Hotel Conclave Boutique, A - 20, Kailash Colony, New Delhi - 110048, Through Its Authorized Signatory Rajive Kumar Tiwari, S/o Shri Gopi Shyam Tiwari, Aged About 51 Years, Senior Manager, Essar Power Transmission Company Limited, House No. 2, Pushpa Pallav Colony, Balgi Road, Lata, Post - Jamnipali, District Korba Chhattisgarh.

2. Essar Power M.P. Limited, A Company Incorporated Under The Provisions Of Companies Act, 1956 And Having Its Registered Office At Lower Ground Floor, Hotel Conclave Boutique A - 20, Kailash Colony, New Delhi - 110048- Through Manoj Kumar Panda, S/o Gadadhar Panda, Aged About 44 Years, Senior Manager (Legal), Essar Power M.P. Limited, Village - Bandhora, Post - Karsualal, Tehsil - Mada, District Singrauli Waidhan (M.P.) ....... Petitioners -Versus -

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. The Director General Of Police, Chhattisgarh, Police Headquarters, Raipur, Chhattisgarh - 492001.

3. The Inspector General Of Police, Sarguja, Ambikapur, District Sarguja Chhattisgarh.

4. Power Grid Corporation Of India Ltd, Having Its Registered Office At B - 9, Qutab Institutional Area, Katwaria Sarai, New Delhi - 110016.

5. Superintendent Of Police, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh.

6. Station House Officer, P.S. Raghunath Nagar, District Balrampur Chhattisgarh.

7. Superintendent Of Police, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh.

8. Station House Officer, P.S. Chadni, Biharpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. .......RespondentS 25.03.2021 Mr. Manoj Paranjpe with Ms. Vaishali Mahilange, Advocates for the Petitioners.

Ms. Sunita Jain, Govt. Advocate for the State. Heard

Learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw this petition as it has become infructuous.

In view of such submission, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous.

Sd/- Li (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Ashok