← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4066/2018dismissed

Tapas Kumar Vishwas v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-06-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4066 of 2018 Tapas Kumar Vishwas S/o Late Shri Hirendranath Vishwas, Aged About 56 Years, Occupation Sahayak Grade-II/ Sanganak Samudayik Swasthya Kendra Masturi, R/o Gram Masturi, Thana Masturi, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh through Sachiv, Swasthya Avm Pariwar Kalyan Vibhag, Chhattisgarh Shashan Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Sanchalak, Swasthya Sewaye Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Sambhagiya Sanyukt Sanchalak, Swasthya Sewaye, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. Collector, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

5. Mukhya Chikitsha Avm Swasthya Adhikari, Karyalay Mukhya Chikitsha Avm Swasthya Adhikari Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

6. Khand Chikitsha Adhikari, Samudayik Swasthya Kendra Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

7. R. K. Koshle, Sahayak Grade-III, Prathmik Swasthya Kendra Darrighat Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Rajendra Kumar Patel, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board

20/06/2018 The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 05.06.2018 Annexure P-2 whereby the services of the petitioner have been placed under suspension under the provisions of CG Civil Services Conduct Rules, 1965.

2.

As per the provisions of Rule 23 of CG Civil Services Conduct Rules, the order of suspension is an appealable order. The petitioner in the instant case seems to have not preferred any appeal against the said order and straightway filed the present writ petition. Since there is an alternative efficacious statutory remedy of appeal available to the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to entertain the petition at this juncture. 3.

Accordingly, reserving the right of the petitioner to prefer an appeal against the order of suspension, the present writ petition stands dismissed of as not maintainable.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE Bhola