Smt. Pushpalata Jain v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet W.P.(CR.) No. 357 of 2019 Smt. Pushpalata Jain, W/o. Ranidaan Jain, Aged About 54 Years, R/o. Narsingh Ward No. 12, Near State Bank Of India, Dongargarh, Police Station and Tehsil Dongargarh, Police Station and Tehsil Dongargarh, District Rajnangaon Chhattisgarh. Through General Power Of Attorney Holder Namely Ranidaan Jain, S/o Late Shri Nemichand Jain, Aged About 55 Year, R/o. Narsingh Ward No. 12, Near State Bank Of India Dongargarh, Police Station And Tehsil Dongargarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh, Through : Secretary, Department Of Home, (Police), Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Revenue and Civil District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2.

Inspector General of Police, Durg Range, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh. 3.

Superintendent of Police Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 4.

Station House Officer Dongargarh, District Rajnangaon Chhattisgarh. 5.

Mahendra Prasad Kalar S/o Gopichand Kalar Aged About 40 Years, R/o. Village Kurubhaat, Police Station and Teshil Dongargarh District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents 11/07/2019 Mr. Surfaraj Khan, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Adil Minhaj, P.L. for the State/Respondents No.1 to 4. Heard.

Learned State counsel submits that reply has been filed on behalf of the State, in which it has been stated that no cognizable offence is made out on the basis of the complaint made by the petitioner. Therefore, the petition has now become infructous.

Counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this petition. Accordingly, the petition is disposed off as not press. The petitioner shall be at liberty to file repeat petition in case some occasion arises.. Sd/- balram (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge