Lekhram Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.3301 of 2017

1. Lekhram Sharma S/o Govind Prasad Sharma Aged About 43 Years R/o Kailash Nagar, Beergaon, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Roshan Lal Tandon, S/o Sakhuram Tandon Aged About 34 Years Rj/o Satnami Para Sarona, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Bhupender Singh Sindhu, S/o Late Karam Singh Sindhu Aged About 60 Years R/o Udai Society Tatiband, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. Raitesh Jaiswal, S/o Dilip Jaiswal Aged About 30 Years R/o House No. A12, Riddhi Siddhi Park Amlidih Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

5. Chagan Lal Sahu S/o Jograi Sahu Aged About 47 Years R/o K B P 115, Phase 3, Kabir Nagar Tatiband, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Director, Health Services Directorate Of Health, Indravati Bhawan, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. Block Medical Officer, Block Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh --- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. R.S. Baghel, Advocate For State :

Mr. Dhiraj Wankhede, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 08/12/2017 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made an application under the provisions of

Chhattisgarh Rajya Upcharyagrah Tatha Rogopchar Sambandhi Sthapnaye Anugyapan Adhiniyam, 2013 (henceforth "Adhiniyam, 2013") for registration but the same has not been considered and decided till date and, therefore, he may be permitted to file fresh application for registration and the same may be directed to be decided expeditiously.

(2) Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that the application filed by the petitioner for registration under Adhiniyam, 2013 has been decided.

(3) I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. (4) Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to file fresh application for registration under the Adhiniyam, 2013 and, in turn, the respondents authorities shall consider and decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

(5) With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-