Rajendra Kumar Sen v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 4014 of 2019 Rajendra Kumar Sen, S/o Shri Harprasad Sen, aged about 34 years, R/o Vinayak Parisar Gulmohar Colony Near Civil Public School Bhopal Madhya Pradesh. At present R/o Bilaspur Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG). ---- Applicant

Versus

State of Chhattisgarh, through Station House Office, Police Chowki, C.S.E.B. Police Station Kotwali, District Korba (CG).

---- Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate For Non-applicant : Ms. M. Asha, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board 01.08.2019 1.

This is the second bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the applicant, who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.222/2018 registered at Police Station Police Chowki, C.S.E.B. Police Station Kotwali, District Korba for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 of Indian Penal Code.

2.

The first bail application of the applicant was rejected on merits by this Court vide order dated 21.01.2019 passed in M.Cr.C. No.7187/2018.

3.

Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that applicant had promised to complainant Sanjeev Singh to provide him supply order for floral plant from the forest department and obtained Rs.1,13,500/- from him, prepared forged work order. On the memorandum of applicant, some documents have been seized from him.

4.

Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is an innocent persons and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that more than 1 year have passed from the date of arrest of

applicant and there is no progress in the trial. 5.

On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application. However, she submits that one criminal case of similar type has already been registered against the applicant in police case diary. 6.

Counsel for the applicant further submits that in another criminal case, the applicant has been enlarged on bail on the ground of delay in trial.

7.

Looking to the above facts and circumstances of the case and looking to this fact that there is no change in the circumstances of the case on the strength of which the applicant be released on bail in the second round of litigation. Consequently, the second bail application is rejected.

8.

Certified copy as per rules.

Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) JUDGE L/-