Bhuvneshwar Prasad Koushik v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 6928 of 2017 • Bhuvneshwar Prasad Koushik S/o Shri Bhagwat Prasad Aged About 39 Years Occupation Service, Posted As Ward Boy In CIMS Bilaspur, R/o Village Nagpura, Post Office Sirgitti, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Medical Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Chhattisgarh Institute Of Medical Science (C I M S), Through Dean, Sadar Bajar, P. S. City Kotwali, Bilaspur, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent And WPS No. 6935 Of 2017 • Smt. Ajeeta Jaiswal W/o Pradeep Jaiswal, Aged About 29 Years Occupation Service, Posted As Lab Technician In C. I. M. S. Bilaspur, R/o Kapil Nagar, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner Vs

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Medical Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, P. S. Naya Raipur, Civil And Revenue District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Chhattisgarh Institute Of Medical Science (C I M S), Through Dean, Sadar Bajar, Police Station City Kotwali, Bilaspur, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent And WPS No. 6933 Of 2017 • Mahesh Kumar Shrivas S/o Shri Jaggu Lal Shrivas, Aged About 40 Years Occupation Service, Posted As Ward Boy In CIMS

Bilaspur, R/o Village Ghuru, Post Office Tifra, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Vs

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Medical Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, P. S. Naya Raipur Civil & Revenue District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Chhattisgarh Institute Of Medical Science (CIMS), Through Dean, Sadar Bajar, P. S. City Kotwali, Bilaspur, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioners Shri Abhishek Pandey, Advocate.

For Respondents/State Shri Ashutosh Pandey, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 11/12/2017

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the parties would not dispute that WPS No.3367 of 2017, decided on 27.09.2017 [Khemendra Singh Dhruw v. Chhattisgarh Institute of Medical Sciences (CIMS) and another] was dealing with an identical issue raised in the present batch of writ petitions, though learned counsel would submit that the said case of Khemendra Singh Dhruw (Supra) was disposed of after submission of reply by the respondents.

3. The matter pertains to consideration of the petitioners' case for their confirmation upon completion of the

period of probation.

4. Whether or not an employee has satisfactorily completed the period of probation is the exclusive domain of the Appointing Authority and this Court is not going to pass any order for confirmation of any employee on successful completion or otherwise of the probation period.

5. In view of the order passed by this Court in Khemendra Singh Dhruw (supra), I am not inclined to keep this present batch of petitions pending.

6. Accordingly, all the writ petitions are disposed of with observation that the respondents shall take decision with regard to the confirmation of the petitioners' services upon successful completion of the period of probation or otherwise, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 04 months from today.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Akhilesh