Pooja Bajpai v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4173 of 2018 Pooja Bajpai W/o Sumit Bajpai Aged About 41 Years R/o Opposite Central Bank, Civil Lines, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through -- Secretary, Skill Development Technical Education And Employment Department Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Director, Employment And Training Department First Floor Block No. 04 Indravati Bhawan New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Joint Secretary, Employment And Training Department First Floor Block No. 4 Indravati Bhawan New Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. Principal Government Industrial Training Institute Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For the Petitioner :

Shri Vikram Dixit, Advocate For the State :

Shri R.K. Gupta, Dy. Advocate General ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board /06/2018

1. Heard counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the respondent No. 2 to consider her case and pass appropriate order for confirmation in her service.

3. The petitioner is working as Training Officer in Government I.T.I. Akaltara, District Janjgir-Champa. She was appointed in the year 2013. Her probation period was of two years. After, lapse of two years she has not been confirmed. Now, she has completed near

about 5 years of service.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned State counsel are agreed that the issue involved in the present case is squarely covered in the order dated 01.05.2018 passed in Writ Petition (S) No. 3447 of 2018 and order dated 19.06.2018 in Writ Petition (S) No. 4050 of 2018.

5. Looking to the submissions of both the parties, facts and circumstances of the case, and aforesaid order, this writ petition is disposed of, with the direction that the petitioner may file fresh representation within 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order for her claim of confirmation in the service before respondent No. 2 and respondent No.2, in turn, shall decide the representation, so received, within a period of 3 months from the date of filing of such representation.

6. This Court does not make any comment on merits of the case. Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge Kamde