High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7030/2017disposed off

Narsingh Ram Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-12-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 7008 of 2017 • Nandkumar Tandon S/o Shri Suklal Tandan Aged About 40 Years Working As Lecturer ( Panchayat ) And Posted At Government High School Achhoti Block Kurud , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent And WPS No. 7030 Of 2017 • Narsingh Ram Sahu S/o Shri Shyamlal Sahu, Aged About 39 Years Working As Teacher (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Atang, Block Kurud, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner Vs

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary , Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development , Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent And WPS No. 7017 Of 2017 • Neelkamal Saitode S/o Shri Devaldas Saitode Aged About 31 Years Working As Lecturer ( Panchayat ) And Posted At Government High School Ghivra District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Raipur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent For Petitioners Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate.

For Respondents/State Shri R.K. Mishra, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 12/12/2017

1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties would jointly and fairly submit that the issue involved in the present writ petitions have already been considered and decided by this Court on 28.11.2017 in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs State of Chhattisgarh and another), therefore, these writ petitions may be disposed of in terms of the order passed in Mukesh Kumar Patel (supra).

2. Accordingly, the present writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court in Mukesh Kumar Patel (supra). A copy of the order passed in Mukesh Kumar Patel(supra) be placed on record of the present writ petitions.

Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Akhilesh