Smt. Samta Bothra v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1923 of 2019 • Smt. Samta Bothra Wd/o Late Sandeep Bothra, Aged About 42 Years Mahaveer Matching, Shop No. - J - 06, Texlile Market Pandri, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Chhattisgarh.

2. Raipur Development Authority, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. The Municipal Corporation Raipur, Through Commissioner, Zone No. 2, Raipur District - Raipur Chhattisgarh.

4. The Town And Country Planning, Raipur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner Shri Sachin Nidhi, Advocate.

For Respondent No.1/State Shri Jitendra Pali, Dy. A.G. with Smt. Sunita Jain, G.A.

For Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate.

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order On Board 27/05/2019

1. In view of the order passed by this Court in WPC No.1900/2019, Chandra Bai Vs State of Chhattisgarh and others on 24.05.2019, wherein it was ordered as under:- "Perused the order dated 03.05.2018 passed in WP (PIL) 12 of 2018 which finds reference in notice Annexure P-1. In such order the Division Bench of this Court has directed that the encroachments in the Pandri Cloth Market, Raipur shall be identified and dealt with by the Corporation in accordance with law. Primary reading of the notice would show that the petitioner has not encroached the land but notice is served for removing the additional/ illegal construction. Therefore, the direction given in WP (PIL) 12 of 2018 may not be directly applicable for the reasons stated in the notice. The petitioner as

appears has not been heard before issuance of such direction. Under the circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner in pursuance to the notice dated 08.05.2019 may file their respective representations/ submissions within a period of thirty days from today before the Municipal Corporation, Raipur, who will decide the same objectively taking into the spirit of the order passed in WP (PIL) No.12 of 2018 within a further period of 3 months from the date of representation after giving fair opportunity of hearing to the petitioners after hearing them afresh. Therefore, for the present, the notice dated 08.05.2019 shall not be acted upon till then. It is further directed that the petitioner shall not cause any encroachment over the subject area or shall not obstruct the way in any manner which may lead to obstruction of traffic."

2. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of..

3. Copy of the order passed in WPC No.1900/19 referred to above be placed on record of the present writ petition. Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Vacation Judge Akhilesh