High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/3423/2017disposed off

Jai Maa Sheetla Machhuwa Samooh Dashrangpur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-12-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.3423 of 2017 Jai Maa Sheetla Machhuwa Samooh Dashrangpur Through Its President Kumar Kewat S/o Shri Santu Kewat Aged About 47 Years , R/o Village Dashrangpur , Thana & Tahsil Pipariya Civil & Revenue District Kabeerdham Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Agriculture, Pisces Culture Mahanadi Bhawan Capital Complex Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Director Fisheries , Directorate Pisces Culture, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Collector Kabeerdham , District Kabeerdham Chhattisgarh.

4. Deputy Director Fisheries Kabeerdham, District Kabeerdham Chhattisgarh.

5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Kawardha , District Kabeerdham Chhattisgarh.

6. Jay Mata Ki Swa - Sahayta Samooh Dashrangpur , Block Kawardha Thana & Tahsil Pipariya Civil & Revenue District Kabeerdham Chhattisgarh.

--- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Samir Singh, Advocate For State :

Mr. Ashish Surana, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 15/12/2017 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that impugned order dated 04.12.2017 passed by Collector, Kabeerdham, is revisable before the Commissioner, Revenue Division, Durg. (2) At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ

petition with liberty to prefer a revision before the Commissioner, Revenue Division, Durg.

(3) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

(4) The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to prefer a revision before the Commissioner, Revenue Division, Durg. If such revision is filed by the petitioner and, in turn, the Commissioner, Revenue Division, Durg shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the parties expeditiously within a period of two months from the date of receipt of revision of the petitioner. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-