← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/196/2018disposed off

Devanand Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-01-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 196 of 2018 Devanand Patel Son Of Chitrasen Patel, Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Banwaspali, Tahsil Baramkela, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Commissioner- Cum- Director, Directorate Of Panchayat, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

4. Dr. C. V. Raman University, Through Its Registrar, Kargi Road, Kota, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

5. Virendra Kumar Dewangan, Lecturer (Panchayat) Govt. Higher Secondary School, Bahama Block Lailunga, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. B. Gopa Kumar, Dy. Adv. General.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 09/01/18 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has passed the M.Sc. Examination in the year 2014 through Distance Education but his candidature for the post of Lecturer (Panchayat) has been rejected by the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Raigarh by a non-speaking order for which he may be allowed to make representation before the Chief Executive Officer, Raigarh.

2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3.

The prayer appears to be fair and reasonable and is accordingly allowed.

4.

Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to make representation before the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Raigarh within seven days from today and, in turn, the said authority shall consider and decide the petitioner's representation by a reasoned and speaking order within ten days from the date of filing of the representation. 5.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka