Smt. Saraswati Bai v. Bhagirathi Sahu

IN THE HIGH couRT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR CriM. P. No.35 '9'

OF 2015 PETITIONER :

Smt. Saraswati Bai, W/o. Bhagirathi Sahu Aged about- §S Years, R/o.

Applicant Pump House, Maxine Bhata, Post, P.S. &Tehsil~ Korba, Revenue & Civil District- Korba (C.G.).

VERSUS

'

RESPONDENT :

Bhagirathi Sahu, S/o Late Panch Ram Non-Applicant Sahu, Aged About- 57 Years, R/o.

Qtr. No. m-70, Katainar, Banki Mogra Colony, S.E.C.L., P.S. Banki Mogra, Tehsil- Katghora, Revenue &'Civil District- Korba (C.G.).

z, PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE FOR MAKING THE NECESSARY CORRECTION OF AMOUNT IN FIGURE OF RS 37562/-, INSTEAD OF RS 33,512/;- IN THE PARAGRAPH NO.

2 OF THE ORDER DATED 02/03/2015, PASSED IN CRIMINAL REVISION ,,,NO.

:

162/2015 (ANNEXURE P-1).

'i l i W

The vget§t§crner prefer this petitmn on the foHowing facts and gmunds.

.air'zog mam '

%ai€m3n%¥i SB Hon ble Shrl Manlndra Mohan Shrlvastava, J 14 05 2015 Shrl Rlshi Sahu, Counsel for the petitioner.

¥ '

Hgard.

SubmiSsion bf learned courisel for thepetitioner is that this Court hes recorded the salarynaf respondent as"

Rs.33.513l-, 'whereas the gross salary of r espondent is Rs.'37,562/-. Taking Into consrderallon the findings reoorded by the disposing off the petition recorded Court below, this Court while s R's.33,513/- Therefore, it is not a gross salary of respondent a it based on findings recorded-by the case of typographical error br has no merit and is'accprdingly Court below The petition dismissed Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge