Smt. Veena Mishra v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.3502 of 2017 1.

Smt. Veena Mishra W/o Late Laxmikant Mishra Aged About 52 Years R/o Aayurvedam 11 Nagar Marg , Near Maharashtra Bhawan Chaubey Colony Poloice Station Aazad Chowk, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Smt. Pushpa Jain W/o Shri Champalal Jain Aged About 63 Years R/o B - 402 , Tirupati Apartment Tagore Nagar Post Penshanbada Police Station Sadar Bajar Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Dilip Jain S/o Shri Rikhabchand Jain Aged About 33 Years R/o Hosue No. S - 8 , Green Paradise , Vishal Nagar Post Telibandha , Police Station Telibandha District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Revenue Department Mantralaya Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Collector, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Municipal Corporation, Raipur Through Commissioner , District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

4. Assistant Engineer , Chhattisgarh State Electricity Distribution Company Maryadit , Tatibandh Zone Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

--- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. KPS Gandhi, Advocate For State :

Mr. Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 02/01/2018 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners' land has been acquired by respondent No.3-Municipal Corporation, Raipur, but in lieu of which neither land has been given nor compensation has been paid to them, against which they have

made representation before the respondent No.3, which has not been considered and decided till this date and, therefore direction may be issued to the said authority to decide the same expeditiously. (2) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

(3) Be that as it may, respondent No.3-Municipal Corporation, Raipur is directed to consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioners in accordance with law after hearing the parties expeditiously within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

(4) With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to costs.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-