N. Tripathi v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 947 of 2015

1. K.K. Shrivastava S/o Late Shri Shanti Swaroop Shrivastava Aged About 59 years Occupation Service, Assistant Engineer, Water Resources Department And Presently Posted On Deputation As In-Charge Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Tribunal, Kawardha, District Kabirdham, Resident Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh) Civil & Revenue District Kabirdham

Versus

Resources Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur (Chhattisgarh) And WPS No. 953 Of 2015

1. A. K. Tiwari S/o Late Shri S.N. Tiwari Aged About 60 years Occupation Service Assistant Engineer, Water Resource Department, Raipur Presently Posted As Assistant Engineer, Office Of Project Director, C.G. Irrigation Development Project, Data Centre Raipur Civil & Revenue District Raipur Chhattisgarh

And WPS No. 956 Of 2015

1. N. Tripathi S/o Late Shri Krishna Sharma Aged About 59 years Occupation Service Presently Working As Assistant Engineer, Office Of Chief Engineer, Mahanadi Pariyojna, Water Resources Department, Raipur, R/o F -2, Irrigation Colony, Katora Talab Raipur Chhattisgarh Civil & Revenue District Raipur Chhattisgarh And WPS No. 955 Of 2015

1. D.K. Gurbani S/o Shri D.R. Gurbani Aged About 60 years Occupation Service Presently Posted As Assistant Engineer, Water Resources Department, Office Of Chief Engineer, Minimata ( Hasdeo) Bango

Project, Bilaspur R/o Engineers Colony, Kuddudand, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh For Petitioners Shri V.V.S. Murthy, Sr. Advocate with Shri Deepak Jain and Shri Shantanu Kumar, Advocates For Respondent/State Shri Sangarsh Pandey, Dy. Govt. Adv.

For Respondent Ms. Deepali Pandey, Advocate for the intervener. Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 14/07/2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

1.

The petitioners, who are graduate Engineers in the Water Resources Department, have preferred these writ petitions seeking direction to the respondents to include the name of the petitioners at the appropriate place in the list annexed with the Government letter dated 10-2-2015 prepared for promotion of Assistant Engineer (Civil) to the post of Executive Engineer.

2.

It is common ground that during pendency of the writ petitions the promotion orders have already been issued.

3.

In view of the subsequent development, the prayer made in the writ petitions has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, all the writ petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to prefer fresh writ petitions by raising all substantial grounds, including the grounds in the present writ petitions for seeking promotion on the post of Executive Engineer.

4.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Gowri