← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/24/2018disposed off

Rishi Raj Bhrigu Sanskrit Samajik Shiksha Samiti Titurdih v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-01-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 24 of 2018 Rishi Raj Bhrigu Sanskrit Samajik Shiksha Samiti Titurdih, Durg, Address H.No. 460, Ward No. 15, Titurdih, Durg, Through Its Secretary, Brijesh Mishra, S/o Satya Prasad Mishra, Aged About 60 Years, R/o A /8, Street No. 2, Panchshil Nagar, Borasi Colony Durg, Police Station Pulgaon, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, New Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction Raipur,

3. The Commissioner, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. The District Education Officer, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

5. The Block Education Officer, Dhamdha, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

6. Chhattisgarh Sanskrit Vidyamandal Raipur, Through The Secretary, Chhattisgarh Sanskrit Vidyamandal Premise Of Directorate Of Public Instruction, Pensionbada, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. H.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Mr. Dilman Rathi Minj, Dy. Adv. General.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 09/01/18 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order dated 01.08.2017 (Annexure - P/2) has been passed after inspecting the school in absence of the petitioner and as such no opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner nor he was allowed to be present at the time of inspection of school premises and the impugned order has been passed.

2.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent- State would submit that fresh inspection will be made by the respondents No. 4 and 5 in presence of the petitioner.

3.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 4.

Be that as it may, the respondents No. 4 and 5 are directed to make an inspection of the petitioner's school along with the officers in presence of the petitioner or his representative within 15 days from today and prepare a report thereafter and pass a fresh order after hearing the petitioner expeditiously within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. It is made clear that the petitioner is obliged to co-operate with the committee so constituted for inspection and accord necessary assistance.

5.

With the aforesaid observation and liberty to the petitioner, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka