← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2322/2015allowed

Rosmerta Technologies Limited v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-02-08Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 2322 of 2015 Rosmerta Technologies Limited Through Its Authorised Signatory, Shri Pankaj Madan, S/o Late Shri Charanjeet Madan, Aged About 43 Years, Presently Working As Director, Rosmerta Technologies Limited, C- 322, New Panchwati, District Ghaziabad (Uttar Pradesh) Pin Code- 201001 ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Transport, Chhattisgarh Government, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) Pin Code- 492001

2. Transport Commissioner, Government Of Chhattisgarh, O/o Transport Commissioner, C- Block, Third Floor, Indravati Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) Pin Code- 492004

3. Special Secretary, Transport Department, Chhattisgarh Government, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh), Pin Code- 492001

4. Additional Transport Commissioner, Government Of Chhattisgarh, O/o Transport Commissioner, C- Block, Third Floord, Indravati Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh), Pin Code- 492004 ------Respondents For Petitioner:

Shri RN. Singh, Senior Advocate along with Shri Siddharth Seth, Advocate.

For Respondent/State:

Shri Prafull N. Bharat, Additional Advocate General.

Hon'ble The Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Judgment on Board Per Navin Sinha, Chief Justice 08/02/2016 1.

We have heard Learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner. Though we were sought to be forcefully persuaded with regard to the illegality of the impugned order dated 30.11.2015 more particularly in context of our order dated 14.9.2015 in W.P.(C) No.1632/2015, in view of the fairness on part of the Advocate General that the impugned order was not in compliance with the directions of the Court, we refrain from any further discussion or observations

at this stage. The impugned order dated 30.11.2015 is set aside for passing of a fresh appropriate orders strictly in accordance with the earlier order dated 14.9.2015.

2.

Let such fresh appropriate orders be passed within a maximum period of two months from the date of receipt and/or production of copy of the present order before the authority concerned. 3.

The Writ Petition is allowed.

Sd/- Sd/- (Navin Sinha) (P. Sam Koshy) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE Priya