T. Radhakrishnan v. Union Of India And ORS.

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH

ATBILASPUR W.P.fS) No.

1$^ /201F, T.

Radhakrishnan, IAS, S/o.

Thankappan, aged about years, Director, Tribal Research And Training Institute, Deendayal Upadhyay Nagar, Raipur, Police Station Deendayal Upadhyay Nagar, Civil & Revenue District Raipur (C.G.) Pin -492010 PETITIONER ^'i ^^^ .^^^/.^-K% y'r.-*^'/i/i/i^IL.i'**'y .y-- •",'^lw"^-}>

VERSUS

l] " Union of India, Through its Secretary, Department of Personnel and Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions, North Block, New Delhi-iioooi RESPONDENTS 2]^" State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Civil & Revenue District Raipur (C.G.) Pin - 492002 3] State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Civil & Revenue District Raipur (C.G.) Pin - 492002 4] '

State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Commercial Taxes Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Civil & Revenue . District Raipur (C.G.) Pin - 492002 5] The Chhattisgarh Board of Revenue, Through the Secretary, Mungeli Naka, Bilaspur, Police Station Civil Lines, Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur (C.G.) Pin-495001 WRIT PETITION UNDERARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

3rcT rt<|i)irt^, yTfl'M'KS, Rlciwy WTOT sKVW..w ^ .C-S^)...B'^3..^201 S~~'

3n^5rq5Ri( sn^r^iil?^;

awan^rshtii* ^rafef^i ftWcfl'? fgiAxFji^ii^ ^siRmsn^i ®<nwaf^a-sn^i S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra 21-4-2015 ;ounsel for the petitioner.

Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Shri Rajesh Kumar Kesharwani, counsel for respondent Nos.1.

Shri Shashank Thakul;

t, GA for the State.

Heard.

Petitioner isan office) of the IAS Cadre. He is assailing the charge sheet issued to him h/ide Annexure-A-1 under Rule 8 of fhe Indian Administrative Servict ^s (Discipline andAppeal) Rules, 1969..

Iwas earlier issued, the petitioner had When similar charge sheet| approached fhe jurisdictiona| Central Administrative Tribunal.

The petitioner being ^ member of All India Services, the writ petition is not maintainable.

Accordingly, it is dii jmissed with liberty to prefer aduly constituted application |before the jurisdictional Central Administrative Tribunal.

^ Sd//- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Nirala wg-Cta ipnicra, wiy- FS/]-7/20i4-2.oo.ooo.