Raju Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4267 of 2019

1. Raju Singh S/o Hanuman Singh Aged About 33 Years Working As Teacher (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. Middle School Latkonikhurd, Block Marwahi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

2. Preetam Kumar Koshle S/o Late Shri Ratna Lal Koshle Aged About 37 Years Working As Teacher (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. Middle School Gujartola, Block Marwahi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. Jagendra Singh Dhruw S/o Shri Radhelal Dhruw Aged About 35 Years Working As Teacher (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. Middle School Khaira, Block Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director Directorate Of Chhattisgarh Public Instruction Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. District Education Officer Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For State :

Ms. Astha Shukla, Mr. Sameer Behar, Mr. P. Acharya, Panel Lawyers Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board

18/06/2019

1. Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions wherein the circular dated 23.04.2016 has been quashed, petitions allowed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post.

2. In view of the aforesaid submission and the impugned order and action is based on circular dated 23.04.2016 which has been quashed in the case referred to herein above, the petition also deserves to be allowed with the direction that the petitioners shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered them on a lower post or on the same post.

3. No order as to costs.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit