← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCONT/524/2015disposed off

Surendra Prasad Mishra v. Mr. Subrat Sahu

2016-01-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra4 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 503 of 2015 • M. L. Sahu S/o Shri Aaju Ram Sahu, Aged About 45 Years Working As Head Master, Govt. Middle School, Khaida ( D ), Block Baloda, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh)

Versus

1. Subrat Sahoo Sectetary, Education Department, Present Address Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur. District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Shri L. S. Marawi, Director Public Instructions, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).........(Contemnors) CONT No. 504 Of 2015 • Keshav Ram Sahu S/o Channu Lal Sahu, Aged About 55 Years Working As Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Risda, Block Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh)

1. Subrat Sahoo Secretary, Education Department, Present Address Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Shri L. S. Marawi, Director, Public Instructions, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).......(Contemnors) CONT No. 516 Of 2015 • Tulsi Ram Verma S/o Matthu Lal Verma, Aged About 52 Years Working As Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Khairtal, Block Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh) • Shri L. S. Marawi Director, Public Instruction, Raipur District Raipur

Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh).......(Contemnors) CONT No. 517 Of 2015 • Sahas Ram Patkar S/o Baran Lal Patkar, Aged About 53 Years Working As Head Master, Govt. Middle School, Mudpar, Block Simga, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh • Shri L. S. Marawi , Director, Public Instructions Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ..........(Contemnors) CONT No. 524 Of 2015 • Surendra Prasad Mishra S/o Late Pandit Ram Lakhan Mishra, Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Manpur, Post Mahora, P.S. Patna, Tahsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh

1. Mr. Subrat Sahu Aged About 55 Years The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Mr. L.S.Maravi, Aged About 56 Years The Director, Public Instructions, Directorate, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Smt. Kamayni Kashyap Aged About 54 Years The District Education Officer, Baikunthpur, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh .........(Contemnors) ---- Respondents CONT No. 567 Of 2015

1. Awadhram Dewangan S/o Shri Hemsai Dewangan, Aged About 46 Years Working As Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Ravaan Block Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

2. Smt. Anuti Verma W/o Shri Devendra Kumar Verma, Aged About 43 Years Working As Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Civil

Line Baloda Bazar, Block Baloda Bazar, District Baloda BazarBhatapara, Chhattisgarh

3. Jitanshu Prasanna Verma S/o Bharat Lal Verma, Aged About 37 Years Working As Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Girls Middle School Baloda Bazar, Block Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh • Shri L. S. Marawi , Director, Public Instructions Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ..........(Contemnors) CONT No. 554 Of 2015 • Sudarshan Prasad Koshariya S/o Late Dani Prasad Koshariya, Aged About 54 Years Working As Head Master, Govt. Middle School, Biladi, Block Tilda, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh • Shri L. S. Marawi , Director, Public Isntructions, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ..........(Contemnors) CONT No. 566 Of 2015

1. Dukhitram Sahu S/o Shri Jagnoo Prasad Sahu, Aged About 47 Years Upper Division Teacher, Presently Working As Cluster Coordinator, Baloda Bazar, Block Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

2. Diluram Sahu S/o Domar Singh, Aged About 42 Years Working As Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Baloda Bazar, Block Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh • Shri L. S. Marawi , Director, Public Instructions Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ..........(Contemnors)

For Petitioners Shri C. J. K. Rao, Advocate For Contemnors Ms. Purnima Singh, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 13/01/2016 1.

Learned counsel for the contemnors would submit that the representations preferred by the petitioners have been decided and thus the contempt has been purged.

2.

In view of the above, nothing survives in these contempt petitions for proceedings further in the matter. Accordingly, the contempt petitions are disposed of, however, the petitioners would be at liberty to file a fresh writ petition, if the grievance still subsists. Sd/- JUDGE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA Nirala